AnythingOnline
Cooling Tower Cycles of Concentration & Blowdown Calculator HVAC
100% Free • No Sign-Up

Cooling Tower Cycles of Concentration & Blowdown Calculator

Balance cooling tower water chemistry, calculate evaporation, blowdown, and makeup GPM flow rates, and quantify water and sewage utility savings from increasing COC.

Continuous Blowdown Rate
3.43 GPM
206 Gallons / Hour
Total Makeup Water Rate
15.5 GPM
Evaporation: 12.0 GPM
Water Balance Breakdown
Evaporation Loss (E): 12.00 GPM (0.80% circ)
Blowdown Drain (B): 3.43 GPM (22% makeup)
Drift Droplet Loss (D): 0.075 GPM
Effective Cycles of Concentration (COC): 4.50
Water Conservation & Utility Cost
Annual Makeup Water: 3.26 Million Gal
Annual Water + Sewer Cost: $40,750 / yr
Savings vs Low COC (2.0): Save $20,400 / yr

Recommended Tools & Equipment

Tested hardware and components for high reliability

100% Free Tool Zero Sign-Up

Cooling Tower Water Balance & Cycles of Concentration (COC)

Evaporative cooling towers reject building or process heat through the latent heat of vaporization of water (~1,000 BTU/lb). Because only pure water evaporates, dissolved minerals (calcium carbonate, silica, chlorides, sulfate) remain behind, progressively concentrating in the recirculating basin water.

1. The Water Balance Equation

Conservation of mass requires makeup water (M) to replace water lost to evaporation (E), intentional blowdown (B), and windage drift (D):

$$M = E + B + D$$

Evaporation rate is determined by the heat rejection load and thermal range (\Delta T = T_{\text{in}} - T_{\text{out}}):

$$E = \text{GPM} \times \Delta T \times 0.0008 \approx 3.0\ \text{GPM per 100 Tons}$$

2. Cycles of Concentration (COC) Formula

Cycles of concentration measures how many times dissolved solids concentrate in the basin relative to incoming municipal makeup water:

$$\text{COC} = \frac{\text{Chloride}_{\text{basin}}}{\text{Chloride}_{\text{makeup}}} = \frac{\text{Conductivity}_{\text{basin}}}{\text{Conductivity}_{\text{makeup}}} = \frac{M}{B + D}$$

Solving for required blowdown rate (B):

$$B = \frac{E}{\text{COC} - 1} - D$$

3. Diminishing Returns of Increasing COC

Increasing COC from 2 to 4 slashes blowdown volume by 66%, delivering massive water and sewer savings. However, increasing COC from 5 to 8 yields only modest marginal water savings while exponentially increasing scaling risk (calcium carbonate scaling and silica precipitation).

Frequently Asked Questions

What determines the maximum safe Cycles of Concentration for a facility?

The limiting chemical constituent in local makeup water determines the maximum safe COC. In hard water regions with high silica (>30 ppm) or high calcium hardness (>250 ppm), COC must be capped around 3.5 to 4.5 to avoid scaling condenser tubes, whereas soft municipal water can safely operate at 6 to 8 COC.

Why does increasing COC reduce chemical treatment inhibitor costs?

Corrosion and scale inhibitors are dosed in parts per million (PPM) of makeup water. High blowdown rates dump expensive chemical inhibitor down the sewer. Increasing COC keeps inhibitor circulating longer, cutting chemical consumption.