AnythingOnline
Free EDM Spark Gap & Electrode Sizing Tool Machining & Fabrication
100% Free • No Sign-Up

Free EDM Spark Gap & Electrode Sizing Tool

Calculate dielectric spark gap overcut per side, total electrode undersize allowance for roughing & finishing, pulse discharge energy, and volumetric metal removal rates.

Discharge Parameters & Tooling

A
μs
CNC Orbiting & Discharge Voltage
mm
V

📊 Spark Gap & Sizing Results

Spark Gap (Overcut / Side)
-- mm
-- in/side
Total Electrode Undersize
-- mm
Across diameter
Discharge Energy per Pulse: -- mJ
Estimated Metal Removal Rate (MRR): -- mm³/min
Frontal Spark Gap (Depth Overcut): -- mm
Estimated Surface Finish (Ra): -- μm Ra
Volumetric Electrode Wear (EWR): -- %
Evaluating EDM spark dynamics...
Empirical EDM Spark Gap Formula:
Gap_side = k · I_p^0.38 · t_on^0.28
Undersize_dia = 2 · (Gap_side + Orbit_radius)
Electrode must be manufactured smaller than cavity by Undersize_dia to ensure finished part matches drawing.

Recommended Tools & Equipment

Tested hardware and components for high reliability

100% Free Tool Zero Sign-Up

1. The Spark Gap Overcut Phenomenon in Sinker EDM

In Electrical Discharge Machining (EDM), the tool electrode never physically touches the workpiece. A dielectric fluid (hydrocarbon oil or deionized water) insulates the interface until the voltage breaks down, generating a plasma channel at $8,000^circ ext{C}$ to $12,000^circ ext{C}$. This sparks across an active physical gap called the spark gap (or overcut).

Because sparks fire laterally in all directions, the eroded cavity is always larger than the electrode by the spark gap distance on every side: $$g_{side} = k cdot I_p^{0.38} cdot t_{on}^{0.28}$$ Where $I_p$ is peak pulse current, $t_{on}$ is pulse duration, and $k$ is an empirical constant governed by the dielectric fluid and workpiece conductivity.

2. Electrode Undersize & CNC Orbiting Motion

Modern CNC sinker EDM machines rarely plunge electrodes in a static 1D stroke. They employ planetary orbiting (circular, spherical, or vector orbiting). Orbiting sweeps debris out of the gap, dramatically reduces arcing risk, and produces uniform mirror finishes.

To produce a cavity of target width $W_{cavity}$, the physical electrode must be machined to: $$W_{electrode} = W_{cavity} - 2 cdot (g_{side} + R_{orbit})$$ Toolmakers typically fabricate at least two electrodes: a roughing electrode with large undersize ($0.25 - 0.50 ext{ mm}$ per side) to hog out bulk material at high current, and a finishing electrode with minimal undersize ($0.02 - 0.05 ext{ mm}$) to achieve precise tolerances and fine surface finish.

3. Pulse Energy & Surface Integrity

Each electric discharge delivers discrete thermal energy: $$W_e = V_e cdot I_p cdot t_{on}$$ High energy pulses ($> 50 ext{ mJ}$) excavate large craters, resulting in high Material Removal Rates (MRR) but leaving a thick, brittle recast layer (white layer) that contains micro-cracks. Fine finishing pulses ($< 1 ext{ mJ}$) yield velvet or mirror surface finishes ($Ra < 0.4 ext{ }mu ext{m}$) with negligible recast depth.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is graphite preferred over copper for sinker EDM electrodes?

Graphite sublimates directly from solid to gas at 3,650°C without melting, resulting in extremely low volumetric wear ratios (< 0.5%) compared to copper. It is also 5x lighter, machines faster, and resists thermal deformation during heavy roughing.

When should copper-tungsten (CuW) electrodes be used?

Copper-Tungsten (typically 70% W, 30% Cu) is used for eroding tungsten carbide, deep thin ribs, and small-diameter holes. Tungsten resists carbide ablation, while copper provides electrical and thermal conductivity.

What causes destructive DC arcing in EDM?

DC arcing occurs when carbon sludge and eroded metal debris fail to flush out of the spark gap, forming a conductive bridge. Instead of pulsed discharges jumping randomly across the face, continuous electrical current concentrates in one spot, gouging the workpiece and electrode. Proper orbital motion and pressure flushing prevent arcing.

How does frontal overcut differ from lateral side overcut?

Frontal overcut (in the Z-plunge direction) is typically 10% to 20% larger than side overcut because full discharge energy is directed perpendicular to the floor, whereas side walls only experience peripheral fringe sparks.