AnythingOnline
Microstrip Hairpin Bandpass Filter Synthesizer RF
100% Free • No Sign-Up

Microstrip Hairpin Bandpass Filter Synthesizer

Synthesize compact U-folded microstrip hairpin bandpass filters, compute coupled line spacing gaps, calculate external Q factors, and locate tapped 50Ω feed points.

Total Hairpin Length (λg/2)
38.4 mm
Folded Arm: 17.6 mm
Tapped 50Ω Feed Point (l_t)
3.45 mm
External Qe: 16.3
Hairpin Resonator Geometry
50Ω Trace Width (W):
1.68 mm
Effective Permittivity ε_eff:
2.86
Fractional Bandwidth (FBW): 6.12 %
Overall Filter Footprint: ~35 mm × 22 mm
Synthesized Inter-Resonator Gaps (S_i,j)
Gap S₁₂ (S₄₅): 0.65 mm (k₁₂ = 0.052)
Gap S₂₃ (S₃₄): 0.92 mm (k₂₃ = 0.038)
Size Reduction vs Parallel-Coupled: ~55% board area saved

Recommended Tools & Equipment

Tested hardware and components for high reliability

100% Free Tool Zero Sign-Up

Microstrip Hairpin Bandpass Filter Synthesis

The hairpin filter is a compact planar microwave bandpass filter synthesized by folding traditional half-wavelength ((\lambda/2)) parallel-coupled microstrip resonators into a "U" shape. Folding drastically conserves PCB real estate without requiring grounding vias.

1. Resonator Guided Wavelength & Effective Permittivity

For a microstrip line of width (W) on substrate height (h) and relative dielectric (\varepsilon_r), the quasi-TEM effective permittivity (\varepsilon_{\text{eff}}) is given by Hammerstad & Jensen:

$$\varepsilon_{\text{eff}} \approx \frac{\varepsilon_r + 1}{2} + \frac{\varepsilon_r - 1}{2} \left(1 + 12 \frac{h}{W}\right)^{-0.5}$$

The total unfolded electrical length of each hairpin resonator is half a guide wavelength:

$$L_{\text{total}} \approx \frac{\lambda_g}{2} = \frac{c}{2 f_0 \sqrt{\varepsilon_{\text{eff}}}}$$

2. External Quality Factor ((Q_e)) & Tapped Feed Distance

Rather than using extremely narrow coupling gaps at the I/O ports, hairpin filters employ direct tapped 50Ω microstrip lines. The tapping distance (l_t) measured from the bottom folded bend sets the input match:

$$Q_e = \frac{g_0 g_1}{FBW}, \quad l_t \approx \frac{L_{\text{total}}}{\pi} \arcsin\left(\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{4} \frac{Z_0}{Z_{\text{res}} Q_e}}\right)$$

3. Inter-Resonator Coupling Coefficients & Spacing Gaps

Chebyshev low-pass prototype values (g_0, g_1, \dots, g_{n+1}) dictate the required mutual coupling coefficients between adjacent folded resonators:

$$k_{i,i+1} = \frac{FBW}{\sqrt{g_i \cdot g_{i+1}}}$$

The physical spacing gaps (S_{i,i+1}) between adjacent hairpin arms are determined empirically or via coupled line synthesis such that the fringing field produces the exact target mutual coupling.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are hairpin filters preferred over parallel coupled-line (PCL) filters?

Parallel coupled line filters are long, skinny structures that consume significant PCB space along the signal path. Folding each half-wave resonator into a U-shape reduces overall filter length by more than 50% while keeping both input and output ports on a neat, compact footprint.

How does the internal fold gap (Sf) affect hairpin resonance?

Folding the two arms of a resonator close together creates parasitic cross-coupling between the open ends, which slightly lowers the resonant frequency. To counteract this self-coupling, the physical resonator length is trimmed by approximately 2% to 5%.